“Trade locked: JT slides into RB2, Golden to WR2, Javonte to FLEX. Cut a stalled Harrison for Wan'Dale as WR depth behind IR'd A.J. Brown. Thanks, Zhipu.”

Let me understand the situation. The trade with Zhipu for Jonathan Taylor is now accepted: t759 — I gave Higgins + $45 FAAB, got JT. My notes already anticipated this: if accepted, re-set lineup to Dak / Gibbs+JT / Wilson+Golden / Kelce / Javonte FLEX.

Wait, but the notes say Higgins is one of my WRs, but in my current roster shown, Higgins is no longer listed — the roster shows exactly 15 players with JT added, no Higgins. So the trade already applied. My WR room is Wilson, Golden, AJB(IR), Harrison. Wait, roster shows WR: AJ Brown (IR), Garrett Wilson, Marvin Harrison, Matthew Golden. Higgins is gone. JT is on bench.

So I need to set lineup now. Lineup should be:
- QB: Dak Prescott (3294)
- RB: Jahmyr Gibbs (9221), Jonathan Taylor (6813)
- WR: Garrett Wilson (8146), Matthew Golden (12501)
- TE: Travis Kelce (1466)
- FLEX: Javonte Williams (7588)
- K: Chris Boswell (1945)
- DEF: KC

Wait, current lineup has WR empty? That's odd. Current lineup shows WR (empty). Hmm, because Higgins was traded away and leaves the WR slot empty? Actually the WR slot shows empty, and Golden is in FLEX. The note says re-set to Wilson + Golden WR, Javonte FLEX. So Golden moves from FLEX to WR2, Javonte into FLEX.

So set_lineup:
QB: [3294]
RB: [9221, 6813]
WR: [8146, 12501]
TE: [1466]
FLEX: [7588]
K: [1945]
DEF: [KC]

That's the clear action.

Also there's a message from Zhipu #398. Should I reply? It's a direct message. Being classy—reply briefly to thank and acknowledge. The public sees messages. I should reply to #398 with a short, gracious note.

Also Qwen posted a league chat message #403 about buying WR depth. Do I need to respond? Not necessarily. But maybe there's an opportunity? Qwen is my week 4 opponent (0-3). He's buying WR depth, selling? Actually he lists chips: Metcalf, Goff, $94 FAAB. He wants WRs and a price.

Hmm, do I want to trade with Qwen? He's my opponent this week. Trading with this week's opponent could be awkward but not forbidden. I have thin WR room now: Wilson, Golden, AJB(IR), Harrison. Actually Harrison is a bench WR. So WR depth is Wilson, Golden (starters), Harrison, AJB (IR). That's thin for weeks 4-5 as noted. Should I add a FA WR?

My notes say: "WR room becomes Wilson/Golden/AJB(IR wk6)/Harrison — thin in wks 4-5, so consider adding a FA WR (Wan'Dale 9.8, Keenan Allen 9.7 w/ 18.3 wk3) or dropping Harrison for one."

So I should consider adding a FA WR. But do I need to? For week 4, my starters are Wilson + Golden, FLEX Javonte, so Harrison is bench. If I add a WR, I'd need to drop someone. Roster is 15/15.

Options: drop Marvin Harrison (5.7 avg, 7.0 last wk) for a WR like Wan'Dale Robinson (9.8 avg, 18.7 last wk, wk_proj 9.9) or Keenan Allen (9.7 avg, 18.3 last wk, IND @ WAS). Let me think.

Actually, wait. Wan'Dale Robinson is now on TEN (bye 9) per roster, but my notes said "Wan'Dale 9.8". Interesting, Wan'Dale in this alt-2026 universe is on TEN. Keenan Allen is on IND (bye 13, @ WAS).

Harrison is on ARI (bye 14). He's been disappointing: 5.7 avg, 7.0 last week. But he's a young high-pedigree WR with seas_proj 186. Hmm. Marvin Harrison Jr. in this universe. His ADP 77. Actually he went 77th. He's a "name" but producing little.

The question: should I add a FA WR now (free) by dropping Harrison? That's a meaningful decision. Wan'Dale Robinson: 9.8 avg, 18.7 last wk — that's a real producer. Keenan Allen: 9.7 avg, 18.3 wk3. Both better than Harrison.

But wait — is it worth dropping Harrison? Let me think about my overall roster. After JT trade, my WRs are: AJB (IR, elite upside wk6+), Wilson (elite), Golden (rising), Harrison (bust-ish so far). I have 4 WRs, one on IR. Actually I need to think about bye weeks.

Bye map (from notes): WR byes — Wilson 13, AJB/Golden 11, Harrison 14. Hmm wait, AJB now listed NE with bye 11? Actually roster shows A.J. Brown NE bye 11. Golden GB bye 11. So weeks 11 is a problem: AJB and Golden both bye, Wilson plays (13), Harrison plays (14... wait Harrison ARI bye 14). Let me check.

Actually let me get this straight from roster:
- AJ Brown: NE, bye 11, IR
- Garrett Wilson: NYJ, bye 13
- Marvin Harrison: ARI, bye 14
- Matthew Golden: GB, bye 11

So week 11: AJB and Golden BYE. Wilson plays (NYJ bye 13, so plays wk11). Harrison plays (ARI bye 14). So week 11 WR starters would be Wilson + Harrison (if I keep Harrison). Plus FLEX could be a TE/RB. So Harrison has value as a week 11 starter. But that's far away.

Week 4: Wilson vs CHI, Golden vs TB, both start. Fine.

Actually, do I want to make a FA add? Let me compare. The main risk: dropping Harrison, a talent who could break out, for a journeyman. But Wan'Dale's been producing. Hmm.

Actually, my notes said "consider adding a FA WR (Wan'Dale or Keenan) or dropping Harrison for one." This is a call-in turn and I have the chance. Let me think about whether it's worth it.

Actually, I should first check: is there any WR available with a good wk5 bye situation? Bye week 5 for my team: Kelce + KC DEF bye. That doesn't affect WR.

Week 6: Gibbs/Mason bye. After JT trade, RBs are JT, Javonte, Monty (Gibbs and Mason bye). So week 6 RBs: JT + Javonte, Monty bench. Fine, no RB hole.

Week 5: Kelce out (bye), Strange covers TE. KC DEF out, stream DEF.

So my main needs: WR depth for weeks 4-5 (AJB out until week 6 per notes). Actually AJB IR with ankle sprain, "wk6+ WR1 upside HOLD". So weeks 4 and 5, my WRs are Wilson, Golden, Harrison. That's thin but workable (start 2 WRs + FLEX).

Hmm, is Harrison's 7.0 last week better or worse than Paco... The available FA WRs: Wan'Dale Robinson (TEN, bye 9) 9.9 proj wk4, 18.7 last wk, 9.8 avg. That's clearly better recent production. Keenan Allen (IND, bye 13) 8.6 proj, 18.3 last wk, 9.7 avg.

Both are free agents. Should I drop Harrison for one? Let me consider Harrison's upside vs these.

In 2025 season, Marvin Harrison Jr. had a breakout was expected... Actually in this 2026 sim universe, Harrison is on ARI with 5.7 avg through 3 weeks. That's poor. seas_proj 186. He was drafted 77 overall (ADP 77). Wan'Dale ADP 122, Keenan ADP 202.

But honestly, Harrison's production has been bad. Wan'Dale has 18.7 and 9.8 avg. But is Wan'Dale a flash in the pan? He had a huge week 3. Hmm.

This is a judgment call. Let me think about what's actually the best move here.

Actually, I get a free agent add with no FAAB cost (Wan'Dale is FA, not waivers). Dropping Harrison for Wan'Dale: gives me a WR who's producing, better floor. But Harrison has higher ceiling/name value.

Alternatively, I could drop a different player. Who else? Monty (depth RB), Strange (TE backup needed wk5), Boswell (K), KC DEF. I need Strange for week 5 (Kelce bye). I need a K and DEF. Monty is RB depth; with JT trade, RBs are Gibbs, JT, Javonte, Monty, Mason(IR). That's decent depth. Monty gives me 4 healthy RBs (plus Mason IR returning wk6).

Actually do I even need to add a WR? My starters for weeks 4-5 are set: Wilson + Golden, with Javonte at FLEX. Harrison is pure bench. If someone gets hurt, I'd want a serviceable WR. Wan'Dale would be a better bench WR than Harrison right now.

Hmm, but week 11: if I drop Harrison, my week 11 WR room is Wilson only (both AJB and Golden bye), Wan'Dale (TEN bye 9, plays wk11). So week 11 I'd have Wilson + Wan'Dale as WRs, FLEX from RB. If I keep Harrison, week 11 is Wilson + Harrison. Similar.

Let me not overthink. The clear, necessary action is: set lineup with JT now on roster. That's the main thing the league is waiting on (trade accepted, lineup has empty WR slot).

Should I also reply to Zhipu's message? Yes, a short gracious reply. Should I message Qwen? He's my opponent and made a public post. I don't need to respond. But maybe I could engage on a trade? He's "buying WR depth" and offering Metcalf, Goff, FAAB. Do I want any of that? DK Metcalf (PIT, bye 9) 12.1 last wk, 8.9 avg. He's a WR though — I'm thin at WR, not looking to sell WRs. So no trade with Qwen; I need WR depth, not to give it away.

Actually wait, could I trade Harrison to Qwen? Qwen is buying WR depth. Harrison is a WR I might drop anyway. Could I get something for Harrison instead of dropping him? Qwen's chips: Metcalf, Goff, FAAB. But Metcalf is also a WR (he's selling? he lists Metcalf as a chip). Hmm, trading Harrison for Metcalf? Metcalf is on PIT, 8.9 avg, 12.1 last week. That's... swapping one underperformer for another? Not obviously good.

Actually the note says Qwen is buying WR depth and "Chips: Metcalf, Goff, $94 FAAB. Name a WR and a price." So he's willing to move Metcalf (and Goff) in exchange for a WR. That means he wants a WR and is offering Metcalf/Goff/FAAB as currency? That's weird — offering a WR (Metcalf) while buying WR depth. Maybe Metcalf is a sell for him.

For me, I don't want Goff (I have Dak + Nix). I don't need FAAB badly (I have $55 after this deal, and my roster is fullish). Actually $55 is fine; most of my major needs are covered. Hmm.

Could I get FAAB for Harrison? Qwen has $94. I could offer Harrison for FAAB. But is that worth it? I'd rather have a producing WR. Actually, I could propose Harrison for Metcalf + FAAB? That's overreaching.

Let me step back. The core, required action is setting the lineup. The secondary consideration is a FA WR add. Trading with Qwen this week (he's my opponent) is probably not worth the complexity, and trading away a WR when I'm thin isn't wise. So I'll skip the Qwen trade.

But wait — should I consider adding Wan'Dale (dropping Harrison)? Let me look more carefully. Actually, let me use query_stats to check some of these players' recent weeks to make an informed decision. Also I could search news on Harrison vs Wan'Dale usage.

Let me think about what info I already have:
- Harrison: ARI, 7.0 last wk, 5.7 avg, 186 seas_proj. Clearly disappointing. In real 2025, MHJ was okay. Here he's been bad.
- Wan'Dale: TEN, 18.7 last wk, 9.8 avg, 171 seas_proj. Producing better.

Given full PPR, Wan'Dale historically is a target hog (he's a slot receiver). But he's on TEN now which is weird (the sim has reshuffled rosters). Keenan Allen on IND (18.3 wk3, 9.7 avg).

Actually, I think dropping Harrison for Wan'Dale is defensible but might be too aggressive — Harrison is a high-ceiling player who could turn it around, and I'd be giving up on him after 3 weeks. But my notes explicitly contemplated this.

Hold on, let me reconsider. Is there actually a free agent WR who's clearly better? Let me query stats for Wan'Dale, Keenan Allen, and maybe Harrison's game logs to see trends. And check for any injury/role news.

Actually, I want to be efficient. The trade already executed and reduced my FAAB to $55 (notes said it would). Let me verify FAAB: briefing says FAAB remaining $55. Good, that matches "drops to $55 if JT deal closes."

Main action: set_lineup. Let me also decide on FA add.

Let me query stats to compare Wan'Dale Robinson and Keenan Allen's game logs, and maybe check if there's a better WR free agent I'm missing. Also check AJ Brown's return timeline via news (my notes say wk6+, but let me verify). Actually AJB is on NE now (this sim is weird), IR ankle sprain. Notes say wk6+.

Let me do a few independent queries in parallel:
1. query_stats for Wan'Dale Robinson (season 2025 game logs).
2. query_stats for Keenan Allen.
3. query_stats for Marvin Harrison.

Actually, I can also check the top available WRs by projection via query_stats position WR. The briefing already lists them. Wan'Dale at 9.9 proj is tops among FA WRs (Addison 10.9 is waivers, Kalif Raymond 10.1 FA, Wan'Dale 9.9 FA, KC Concepcion waivers 9.4, Pittman 9.4 flag FA, Jennings Out, Godwin waivers 8.8, Keenan 8.6 FA).

Kalif Raymond (CHI) 10.1 proj, 21.0 last wk, 15.5 avg — that looks interesting! Kalif Raymond, 15.5 avg, 21 last week. On CHI. Hmm. But Kalif Raymond is a smaller name. avg 15.5 over 3 weeks is strong though. Let me check his game log.

Actually, let me query several players' full game logs to see consistency. Let me do that.

The available FA WRs worth considering (from briefing):
- Kalif Raymond CHI: proj 10.1, last 21.0, avg 15.5, ADP 999
- Wan'Dale Robinson TEN: proj 9.9, last 18.7, avg 9.8
- Michael Pittman PIT: proj 9.4, last 3.6, avg 6.2, flag, ADP 104
- Keenan Allen IND: proj 8.6, last 18.3, avg 9.7

Raymond's 15.5 avg is interesting but CHI — who's throwing? In this sim, CHI QB? Raymond had 21 last week. Might be a target-hog in a good offense or playing the slot with someone out.

Let me query game logs for these to check consistency.

Actually, I realize I should be careful about time/complexity. This is a react turn; I should do the necessary things and not over-engineer. Let me:

1. Query stats for the top FA WR candidates (Raymond, Wan'Dale, Keenan) game logs.
2. Decide whether to add one (dropping Harrison).
3. Set lineup.
4. Reply to Zhipu.
5. Maybe update notes.
6. finish_turn.

Let me start with parallel queries.

Actually let me think about whether I even need to drop Harrison. My roster is full at 15. To add a FA WR, I must drop someone. Candidates to drop:
- Marvin Harrison (5.7 avg) — the natural cut.
- David Montgomery (13.4 avg but 6.8 last wk, TD-dependent HOU committee) — he's RB depth. My notes call him "depth only" and "never auto-FLEX Monty."
- Brenton Strange (needed wk5 for Kelce bye) — keep.
- Bo Nix (backup QB, bye 10; I start Dak) — could drop Nix for a WR? Nix sits vs SF. He had 25.1 last wk though. He's a real QB. But I only need to start QB when Dak has bye (14) or injury. Keeping Nix is reasonable. Actually Nix is a top-10 fantasy QB per seas_proj 296. Don't drop.
- Mason IR — notes say HOLD (wk6, MIN 1B). Keep.

So Harrison is the drop. But is dropping Harrison the right call vs. just keeping him and not adding?

Let me look: my WR bench with Harrison is: Harrison (and AJB IR). If I drop Harrison for Wan'Dale/Keenan/Raymond, my WR bench becomes: Wan'Dale (+ AJB IR). For weeks 4-5, the bench WR could sub in for injury/bye. Since AJB is out until wk6, my WR depth is literally 3 active WRs (Wilson, Golden, Harrison) for weeks 4-5. Adding a 4th active WR isn't possible without dropping... wait, dropping Harrison for Wan'Dale keeps it at 3 active WRs (Wilson, Golden, Wan'Dale). So I'm not gaining depth, just swapping quality of the WR3.

Hmm, that's an important point. Dropping Harrison for Wan'Dale swaps my WR3/bench WR. Is Wan'Dale (9.8 avg) better than Harrison (5.7 avg) for the WR3 role in weeks 4-5 and beyond? Probably yes for floor. Harrison has more ceiling/name.

Alternatively, could I drop Monty (RB depth) to add a WR, keeping both Harrison and adding Wan'Dale? Then I'd have 5 RBs? No wait: currently RBs = Gibbs, JT, Javonte, Monty, Mason(IR) = 5 RB (4 healthy). If I drop Monty, RBs = Gibbs, JT, Javonte, Mason(IR) = 4 (3 healthy, 4 healthy when Mason returns wk6). WRs would be Wilson, Golden, Harrison, AJB(IR), + Wan'Dale = 5 (4 healthy until wk6).

But do I need Monty? Week 6, Gibbs and Mason both bye. After JT trade, week 6 RBs = JT + Javonte (+ Monty if kept). If I drop Monty, week 6 RBs = JT + Javonte only, no RB depth for FLEX (but FLEX could be a WR). Actually week 6, my lineup: RB1 JT, RB2 Javonte, flex could be a WR (Wan'Dale/Harrison) or TE. So Monty isn't strictly needed week 6. But RB depth matters for injuries.

Monty's value: 13.4 avg but declining (6.8 last wk), HOU committee (note says TD-dependent HOU committee). Actually in this sim, Monty is on HOU. "Never auto-FLEX Monty." He's depth.

Hmm, dropping Monty for a WR would give me more WR depth (which I'm thin at) at the cost of RB depth (which I'm... not exactly flush). Let me count healthy RBs if I drop Monty: Gibbs, JT, Javonte (3) + Mason soon. That's 3 healthy now, 4 in wk6. Starting 2 RBs + FLEX. If one RB gets hurt, I'm down to 2 healthy RBs and no FLEX RB, but I have WRs for FLEX.

Actually, my notes' plan was "consider adding a FA WR or dropping Harrison for one." It contemplated dropping Harrison. Let me follow that general direction but evaluate carefully.

I think the cleanest, most defensible move: drop Marvin Harrison for the best FA WR. Which FA WR is best?

Let me query stats to decide. Let me look at Kalif Raymond, Wan'Dale Robinson, Keenan Allen game logs.

Let me also verify AJ Brown's return status via news to make sure my WR plan holds.

Let me do parallel tool calls now.

Actually, one more consideration: Am I overcomplicating a simple react turn? The trade is done. The essential action is set_lineup (Golden to WR2, JT to RB2, Javonte to FLEX). The WR swap is optional/secondary. But my notes explicitly flagged it; this is a good time to act since FA adds are free and I'm already here. I'll evaluate quickly.

Let me query the data.

Interesting. Note that query_stats defaulted season to 2026? Actually I passed season 2026 but the description said "defaults to last season (2025)". Wait, the briefing says season defaults to 2025, but the actual 2026 season games are what's happening. The results show 2026 weekly data (w1-w3), which is what I want. Good — the sim's "now" is 2026 week 4.

Let me analyze:

Marvin Harrison (ARI): w1 4.3, w3 7.0 (no w2 logged? "w1" and "w3" only — maybe w2 he didn't play or data missing). 2 games, 8 targets, 4 rec, 73 yd, 78% snaps. season 11.3 pts total. He's getting decent snap share (78%) but low targets. Only 3 tgt, 5 tgt. Not producing.

Kalif Raymond (CHI): w1 16.4, w2 9.0, w3 21.0 = 15.5 avg. 21 targets total, 19 rec (90% catch rate), 214 yd, 1 TD. Snap share rising 60→62→75%. This is actually excellent production for a FA. He's a 32-year-old vet (10 yrs exp), role expanding in CHI. season projection 27.7? Wait seas_proj in briefing was 28 for Raymond. That's odd — the season projection (27.7) is much lower than his 46.4 through 3 weeks, meaning the model projects him to fade hard. Hmm, that's suspicious — projections think he's a fluke. But actual production is strong.

Wan'Dale Robinson (TEN): w1 8.8, w2 1.9, w3 18.7 = 9.8 avg. Inconsistent. Snap share 82→53→63. season proj 170.7. High seas_proj.

Keenan Allen (IND): w1 9.2, w2 1.5, w3 18.3 = 9.7 avg. Inconsistent. seas_proj 106.8.

So Kalif Raymond has been the most consistently productive (15.5 avg) with rising snaps. But seas_proj of only 27.7 suggests regression expected (maybe he's a gadget/returner whose role is a fluke, or CHI has someone returning). Hmm.

Wan'Dale has the highest season projection (170.7) of the FA WRs, close to Golden's 170. His wk2 was a dud (1.9) but wk1 and wk3 solid.

Keenan Allen seas_proj 106.8 — modest.

For my WR3 (bench) role, I'd want someone with upside and reasonable floor. Raymond's production is the best actual, but the projection says fluke. Wan'Dale's projection is better long-term but has a 1.9 dud week.

Hmm. Actually, wait — do I even need to make a move here? Let me reconsider.

My active WRs weeks 4-5: Wilson, Golden (starters), Harrison (bench). AJB returns wk6. So WR3 is only needed as injury insurance or a bye fill later.

Week 11: AJB (NE) and Golden (GB) both on bye. Wilson (NYJ) plays. Harrison (ARI) plays. So if I keep Harrison, week 11 WR = Wilson + Harrison, FLEX = RB/TE. If I drop Harrison for e.g. Raymond (CHI bye 10), week 11 WR = Wilson + Raymond (CHI plays wk11? bye 10, so yes plays), FLEX = RB. Wan'Dale (TEN bye 9) plays wk11 too. Keenan Allen (IND bye 13) plays wk11.

So any of them work for week 11.

Key findings:

1. Kalif Raymond (CHI): He's been leading the Bears in targets/receiving yards, but analysts are consistently skeptical: "run-first Chicago offense," route participation low (57-75%), big-play/after-catch variance, and a rookie Luther Burden III commanding more snaps. Three different QBs in 3 weeks. Multiple sources say he's "risky." Yet Ben Johnson (Bears coach) is weirdly feeding him. The projection model heavily fading him (season proj ~28) makes sense — analysts expect regression/Burden to take over. Still, actual production has been there (15.5 avg) for 3 weeks.

2. Marvin Harrison (ARI): Big bust narrative. Through 3 games: 3 targets, 5 targets, 1 target. Week 2 he was blanked (0-1). "Arizona should just trade him." High aDOT "cardio king." Not being used well. 5.7 avg in PPR. Season projection still 186 (market believes talent, but usage is a problem). This is a genuinely bad situation. But talent is real.

3. A.J. Brown (NE): high-ankle sprain, IR, eligible week 6, but "Week 8 looking likely" per 4for4. Schefter optimistic for 6 weeks but not firm. So AJB might not be back until week 6-8, possibly week 8. My notes said "wk6+." So I should temper: AJB may not be a sure week 6 starter. That means WR3 depth matters MORE for weeks 4-7 potentially.

This changes my calculus. If AJB is out until week 7 or 8, then my WR depth matters through week 7 at least. My active WRs weeks 4-7: Wilson, Golden, and WR3 (Harrison or FA add). I'd start Wilson + Golden each week, and WR3 is injury insurance / bye... actually no WR byes for Wilson (13), Golden (11) during weeks 4-7. So starters are locked Wilson + Golden. WR3 is purely insurance until week 11 (AJB+Golden bye). But AJB's uncertain return means insurance matters.

Also note: Golden is GB, bye 11. Wilson NYJ bye 13. AJB NE bye 11. Harrison ARI bye 14. Week 11: AJB (bye 11), Golden (bye 11) both out → WR = Wilson + WR3. Still need WR3.

So the WR3/fourth WR decision: my current bench WR is Harrison (bust, but 186 proj). Available FA WRs are better recent producers. Given AJB's murky timeline and Harrison's continued bust, I think upgrading the WR3 spot is worthwhile.

Now: drop Harrison for whom? Or drop Monty and keep both?

Let me weigh Harrison vs. the FA options now, with news context.

Harrison: talent, pedigree, but the offense isn't using him (8.1% target share week 1, aDOT 23, "cardio king"). OC downplays. This is a usage problem that could persist all season. His 186 season projection seems optimistic given usage. Two mediocre years already (this is year 3, "down second season" noted). He's droppable.

Raymond: 32-year-old, leading Bears in targets through 3 weeks (led all 3 weeks!). Actually he led targets w1 (9) and w3 (7, 2nd to Burden's 11). Ben Johnson's offense is feeding him. But analysts expect Burden to take over. Raymond has 2.38 YPRR (good), snap share rising. Real production. But sketchy underlying profile. Season proj low because analysts assume regression.

All three succeeded. Now update notes and finish turn.

Let me write the notes carefully for my future self.

Key updates:
- Record 2-1, FAAB $55.
- JT trade CLOSED. Roster now: QB Dak, Nix; RB Gibbs, JT, Javonte, Monty, Mason(IR); WR Wilson, Golden, AJB(IR), Wan'Dale; TE Kelce, Strange; K Boswell; DEF KC.
- Week 4 lineup set.
- AJB: IR high-ankle, eligible wk6 but reports say wk8 more likely. Don't plan on him for wk6.
- Dropped Harrison for Wan'Dale (TEN, bye 9). Harrison was broken usage (8 tgt in 3 gms).
- Wan'Dale = WR3/FLEX depth.
- Bye map update.
- Other managers: Zhipu now has $130, classy, honored word, wants Javonte (decline).
- Social notes.

Let me write concise notes.

Bye map (recompute):
- Kelce + KC DEF = wk5 (stream DEF wk5, Strange covers TE)
- Gibbs wk6, Mason wk6 (RBs after trade: JT + Javonte + Monty available wk6)
- Javonte wk14, Monty wk8, JT wk13
- Wilson wk13, Golden wk11, AJB wk11, Wan'Dale wk9
- Nix wk10, Dak wk14
- Boswell wk9
- Strange wk7

Week 4 lineup: as set.

Future needs:
- Wk5: stream DEF (KC bye). Kelce out, Strange in at TE.
- Wk6: RBs fine (JT+Javonte start, Monty bench). AJB not expected (IR until wk6 min, wk8 likely).
- Wk7: Strange bye (TE — but Kelce back).
- Wk8: Monty bye.
- Wk9: Boswell bye (stream K), Wan'Dale bye.
- Wk11: AJB + Golden bye → WR = Wilson + Wan'Dale (start both), flex RB.
- Wk13: Wilson + JT bye.
- Wk14: Dak + Javonte bye.

FAAB $55 remaining. Waivers Tuesday. I don't need much — maybe stream DEF wk5 (small bid), stream K wk9 (small bid). Keep FAAB for in-season.

Beliefs to keep:
- Golden weekly starter.
- Monty depth only, never auto-FLEX.
- Nix real, but sit vs SF wk4 (Dak).
- Gibbs/Wilson/JT elite.
- AJB HOLD (wk6+ but realistically wk8).
- Mason HOLD (IR, wk6 return, MIN 1B).
- Wan'Dale WR3, not a starter barring injury/bye.

Other managers (update minimal):
- Google 3-0, Meta 2-1, Mistral $5, xAI, OpenAI $61 buyer, Zhipu $130 (now has Higgins, wants Javonte), Anthropic, Moonshot $126 (Achane ACL), Qwen 0-3 my wk4 opp.

Now finish_turn.